In this course we will examine and evaluate some of the most important historical and contemporary skeptical arguments.
REQUIRED READINGS
Required readings are available in a reading packet.
GRADING
1. Participation
Discussion is essential to the vitality of the seminar. Your first priority is reading the assignments carefully and working diligently on the writing for the course. Thoughtful, honest, and respectful participation derives from these. Every effort will be made to ensure that the class is a welcoming forum for sharing serious ideas. In addition, participation is more inclusive than many students realize. Being attentive and engaged in class, asking clarificatory questions, and discussing aspects of the course with the instructor during office hours all fall under this heading. Advanced students typically need not worry
about this element of their performance, but the instructor reserves
the privilege of treating participation as constituting up to
10% of the final grade.
No laptops in class.
2. Opening essay: How do Skeptical Arguments Work and What Are They Trying to Achieve?
For the first seminar meeting, there is no assigned reading. Instead, you will prepare an essay on the topic, above.
5-6 pages. Typewritten, double spaced in a 12 point font. No title page. 10% of final grade.
3. Seminar discussion papers
You are required to write 6 short papers. These assignments are intended to stimulate class discussion. It is crucial that these discussion papers be short, clear, and to the point. You may conceive of the assignment as articulating arguments for your position on an important topic in the reading. For
example, you may briefly summarize a central thread of
the reading and critically respond. Or, you may pick a direct quotation from the readings
and attempt to show that the ideas contained in it are misguided
or fail to take into consideration important factors. Note that
your responses need not be negative. You may take these papers as
an opportunity to sympathetically review or to elaborate on proposals
made in the literature.
About 2 pages (3 pages maximum). Typewritten, double spaced in a 12 point font. No title page. 30% of final grade with each paper weighted equally.
4. Seminar leadership
Each student will co-lead one seminar meeting during the semester. This will involve presenting a summary of the themes in the reading that you would like to discuss, as well as critical reactions to those themes. Both of these elements should be informed by at least three contemporary (i.e., written in the last 50 years) secondary sources that the co-leaders will have researched, acquired, and read. These will not be provided by the instructor; instead, the co-leaders will have to decide which secondary sources are illuminating. The secondary sources will typically be journal articles or book chapters. The secondary sources will not be part of the reading for the rest of the seminar, so it will be the responsibility of the co-leaders to fill in details.
A sensible target to aim for is for each co-leader to speak for 15 minutes and then to open up the seminar for discussion. Between the two co-leaders, you should expect to be able to lead the seminar for 90 minutes (the instructor will handle the rest).
You will turn in (1) your notes and outline (2) copies of the three secondary sources used to prepare the seminar. You will be graded, however, solely on the quality of the presentation (20% final grade). You may not write a seminar discussion paper the week you lead the seminar.
Please see the plan for leading the seminar.
5. Final paper
This will be an opportunity for extended discussion of any topic in the course. You are not required to seek additional sources for final papers,
though you may. The final paper may be an extension of a weekly short essay, of the seminar presentation, or may advance completely new ideas. You may certainly use material from your opening essay for the final paper.
14-16 pages (20 pages absolute maximum). Typewritten, double spaced in a 12 point font. No title page. 30% of final grade. Essays are due on the third-to-last day of the exam period (the latest time the Dean's office allows written work to be turned in), namely 5pm, December 19th.
Grading on all writing assignments will be anonymous. Please turn in your papers with only your Williams ID number on it in some unobtrusive place.
Anonymous grading is one way of assuring that the collegiality of our interactions does not cloud my assessment of your work. Grading blindly is not a perfect mechanism for this purpose. One crucial disadvantage to anonymous grading is that the instructor will not know when your work is systematically inadequate and will not approach you with concerns about your writing. As a result, there is an additional burden of maturity and responsibility on your shoulders. You must elect to visit office hours and to seek out informal opportunities to improve your writing.
The desire to preserve the integrity of the anonymous grading system should never prevent you from seeking advice on assignments for this course. You are encouraged to speak with me with your work in hand. Naturally this will reveal facts of authorship, and may give the instructor some insight into your style and interests. Still, your success in meeting the challenges of this course should always be our first concern.
Any direct quotations
or paraphrased material from outside sources must be credited and
footnoted in your favorite style. Violation of this constitutes
plagiarism. If you have questions about how the honor code applies
to written work, please do not hesitate to contact me.
SEMINAR RESOURCES
Office hours - The instructor holds office meetings each week in North Academic Building 306. They are:
| Mondays |
12:30-2:30 |
| Wednesdays |
Noon-1 |
Additional times are available by special arrangement. Students
are welcome to visit individually or in groups.
Students with disabilities who may need disability-related classroom
accommodations for this course are encouraged to set up an appointment
to meet with me as soon as possible and to contact the Dean's
Office (at extension 4262) to better insure that accommodations
are provided in a timely manner.
Schedule of Topics and Readings
September
16 |
| Discussion: |
The Nature and Goals of Skeptical Arguments |
| Readings: |
None
Opening essay due
|
|
23 |
| Discussion: |
Ancient skepticism |
| Readings: |
from Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Skepticism |
Seminar Leaders: Ana Inoa & Samantha Segan
|
|
|
|
Discussion: |
Medieval reactions |
|
Readings: |
from St. Augustine, Against the Academics
from Henry of Ghent, Summa Quaestionum Ordinarium
from John Duns Scotus, Ordinatio |
Seminar Leaders: Sylvia Lawrence & Anthony Nguyen
|
|
|
|
Discussion: |
Skepticism in the Madhyamaka |
|
Readings: |
from Nagarjuna, Mulamadhyamakakarika
from Tsong Khapa, Ocean of Reasoning
|
Seminar Leaders: Everett Case & Jordan Hollander
|
14 |
NO CLASS, INSTRUCTOR IS AWAY
|
21 |
| Discussion: |
Montaigne and Descartes |
| Readings: |
from Montaigne, Apology for Raymond Sebond
from Descartes, Meditations |
Seminar Leaders: Sam Blackshear & Alison Hansen-Decelles
|
28 |
| Discussion: |
Humean skepticism |
| Readings: |
from Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Treatise of Human Nature
|
Seminar Leaders: Austin Stanley & Erik Tillman
|
November
4 |
| Discussion: |
G.E. Moore |
| Readings: |
G.E. Moore, "Proof of an External World, " "Four Forms of Scepticism," and "Certainty" |
Seminar Leaders: Katie Creel & Juanita Monsalve
|
11 |
| Discussion: |
Wittgenstein on certainty |
| Readings: |
Wittgenstein, On Certainty |
Seminar Leaders: Michele Chinitz & Christophe Dorsey-Guillaumin
|
18 |
| Discussion: |
Kripke's Wittgenstein |
| Readings: |
Kripke, On Rules and Private Language |
Seminar Leaders: Laura Biggers & Aditi Chaturvedi
|
December
2 |
| Discussion: |
The new riddle of induction |
| Readings: |
from Goodman, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast |
|
9 |
| Discussion: |
Recent discussions |
| Readings: |
Lehrer, "Why Not Skepticism?"
from Greco, Putting Skeptics in Their Place |
Seminar Leaders: Matthew Furlong & Noel MacNaughton
|
Final paper due DECEMBER 19th, 5pm
|