|
BERKELEY PAPER
NOTES
Hylas tries to rescue his belief in matter by claiming that we
have an abstract idea of matter. I think that he does this because
every time he appeals to his particular idea of a thing, Philonous
shows that its only a perception of that thing, and that perceptions
are in the mind. (If perceptions are in the mind, and every idea
is a perception, then every idea is in the mind. If all of our
ideas are in the mind and ideas are all we have, then everything
is in the mind. At least, that appears to be the main strategy,
as in the argument with the vessel of water, or the argument about
the color of the clouds.)
So, Hylas is trying to avoid committing to a particular idea,
which would always be a sensation, by talking about abstract ideas.
This argument is kind of at the end of the first dialogue.
Hylas seems to have a point. We do seem to have abstract ideas
of things. If I could show that our idea of matter is abstract,
then Philonous main argument would be short circuited.
1. Look up how Hylas and Philonous use the term abstract idea.
2. Contrast this with particular idea (so I need to find out how
they talk about particular ideas).
3. Find some passages where they have this conversation.
4. Find the exact argument about abstract ideas in the text.
5. Think up an example of something that I have an abstract idea
of.
Maybe I have an abstract idea of sound or shape, without thinking
of any particular sound or shape. But what is an abstract sound?
Tentative Outline:
I. Introduction (summary of my paper and what is at stake)
II. Berkeley's argument against abstract ideas
III. My argument for abstract ideas
IV. What Berkeley would say in reply
V. My rebuttal to Berkeley's reply
|