Feature Stories

Taking the Long View

Pope Benedict XVI

Pope Benedict XVI, courtesy of AP/Alexandre Meneghini

The resignation of Pope Benedict XVI on Feb. 28 was a dramatic moment in the history of the Roman Catholic Church and of the papacy, and few people know that history more deeply than does Williams President Emeritus Francis Oakley. An esteemed scholar of medieval political thinking and church history, Oakley shares his views on the current news as seen through a historical lens.

Oakley on precedence… The real precedent, which seems quite analogous to Benedict’s resignation as pope, is that of Celestine V in 1294. He was a hermit, lived all his life in a cave. At the time of a protracted papal vacancy—the church was having a great difficulty in making an appointment—the cardinals dug him out and appointed him. Though a rather saintly figure, he was utterly unprepared for the task and overwhelmed by it. As a result, he resigned after about three months amid mounting chaos. In resigning, the statement he made was not dissimilar to that of Benedict XVI—in effect, he acknowledged that he was in over his head. He couldn’t discharge the heavy responsibilities thrust upon him. Interestingly, Benedict has some sort of veneration for him. Apparently he has visited Celestine’s tomb three times. It seems reasonable to think that resignation may have been on his mind for some time.

On rewriting history… The Catholic Church has an ancient tradition, but it is, oddly, a remarkably presentist institution, and that preoccupation with the present casts a long shadow over the past. As a result, its history tends to be rewritten to bolster present-day policies and beliefs. The official list of popes is a good example of that process. As a precedent for Benedict’s resignation, commentators have pointed to that of Gregory XII in 1415, but in Gregory’s case there was a very complicated micro-politics involved. As far as I’m concerned, he was simply a claimant to the papacy at a time when there were three lines of claimants. He happened to be the Roman claimant, but it is only since around the time of the French Revolution that the Vatican has moved consistently to rehabilitate the Roman line and to claim retroactively that it had been the true line all along. Insofar as historical evidence counts, that is simply not correct. At the time of the disputed election of 1378, no one knew who the real pope was; that is why there was a crisis. Moreover, Gregory XII and his opposite number in Avignon were both deposed in 1409 by the Council of Pisa, which then elected Alexander V. For a while it looked as if that would succeed in ending the schism. Then Alexander, who was well respected, died suddenly and was succeeded by John XXIII, who was not. He turned out, in fact, to be a somewhat corrupt figure. In 1415, as a result, and even though it viewed him as the true pope, the Council of Constance deposed him as a criminal. Though it viewed neither Gregory XII nor his Avignonese rival as legitimate pope, in order to clear the decks it offered both of them a chance to resign. The Avignonese claimant declined the offer and, as a result, was deposed. Gregory XII went along with it and by doing so saved himself from a similar fate. There’s a sort of Orwellian aspect to the way in which this whole confused piece of history has been handled in the official histories ever since the First Vatican Council in 1870. Even the currently official list of popes (which dates only to 1947) is in some degree an ideological statement. It lists both the Avignonese and Pisan lines as antipopes, a judgment historians have been unable to make. But outside sources such as the Encyclopedia Britannica have bought into it.

On demystifying the papacy… So far as Benedict is concerned, I take his statement about why he is resigning at face value. He’s old, clearly not well, and, after all, he watched his predecessor hang on disastrously when he couldn’t do the job out of some sort of misplaced mystification of the papal office. This led to factions, chaos, all the rest. So I think it does Benedict credit to make this move, and I think it will have a demystifying effect on what is, after all, an administrative job. That would be healthy. The pope is not a super-priest. He’s just a bishop like other bishops. What distinguishes him is simply the preeminence of his administrative and teaching role.

A Grounded Identidad

A 1956 photograph of the Rios Brothers from Professor Merida Rua's book A Grounded Identidad

Oscar Rios (left) and his brother William are dressed to the nines in this 1956 photograph. Puerto Ricans often confounded the rigid black-white-only racial order of Chicago. Members of the Rios family shared stories of how each negotiated conceptions of race and space, citizenship and belonging.

As a young girl in Chicago’s Puerto Rican neighborhoods, Professor Merida Rua took “field trips” every Sunday after church to study her family’s history. Her father steered their Buick through the struggling neighborhoods of his 1950s childhood to the “places of his aspirations”—the skyline of Lake Shore Drive and the imposing walls of the University of Chicago. Rua and her mother, two sisters and grandmother listened, rapt, to his stories, which spoke to the larger Puerto Rican experience in Chicago.

Rua, associate professor of Latina/o studies and chair of American studies, returned to her home city as an academic researcher to explore the impact of Puerto Rican migration on Chicago and the communities in which they lived and worked. In her book A Grounded Identidad: Making New Lives in Chicago’s Puerto Rican Neighborhoods (Oxford University Press, 2012) Rua blends history and ethnography to tell the story of how a post-war migration of a small number of recruited household workers and laborers grew into the third-largest Puerto Rican population in the continental U.S. Along the way they built strong communities that were challenged by economic struggle, job discrimination, and the upheaval of urban renewal and the tumultuous 1960s. “My work,” she says, “focuses on neighborhoods people have lost.”

Her search to reclaim their stories took Rua to Chicago’s first Puerto Rican-owned funeral home, which she lived above in an apartment while conducting her research. Listening to family and friends of the deceased tell stories at wakes and services, she discovered a novel lens through which to view the history of Puerto Ricans in Chicago and the neighborhoods they remembered. The first wave of Puerto Rican migrants to the city found themselves in a unique position as outsiders in the country of their citizenship and struggling for fair treatment in employment, housing, and education. But the stories Rua heard in the funeral home were a testament to the pride in what Puerto Ricans had achieved in Chicago and a deep attachment to the neighborhoods that sustained them over the decades.

“They were hopeful stories of resiliency and strong connection to community despite obstacles and struggles” Rua says.

Rua is sharing her research as part of the weekly Faculty Lecture Series, which continues through March 14. See the complete schedule here.

 

 

 

 

What Sawyer Said

When CBS News rolled into Williamstown in February 1964 for an interview with President John E. Sawyer ’39 and University of Texas Chancellor Harry Ransom, the college was on the cusp of a decade of transformation.

Some elements of Sawyer’s vision for Williams, such as the phasing out of fraternities, were already being implemented. Other changes were yet to come. But throughout the hour-long interview, led by which aired that March on the weekly public service program One of a Kind, Sawyer offered his insights into the challenges facing society, higher education, and Williams, in particular. His ideas and ideals—and the eloquent case he made for the liberal arts—were remarkably prescient and continue to resonate today.

We asked members of the Williams faculty to lend their voices to the conversation that Sawyer began all those years ago. Their essays accompany the video clips below. Plus, read A Legend Brought to Life, a short commentary on watching the video by Jim Kolesar ’72, Assistant to the President in Public Affairs. To see the entire broadcast, contact communications@williams.edu.

K. Scott Wong, James Phinney Baxter III Professor of History and Public Affairs: “It is remarkable that this conversation took place right before a watershed period in American history that would bring significant changes to our society, changes that are still unfolding today.” More →

Will Dudley ’89, Provost, Professor of Philosophy: “Jack Sawyer remains exactly right about the purpose of a liberal arts education: We’re concerned with the growth of young men and women.” More →

Denise Buell, Chair and Professor of Religion: “Being stretched to engage a wide range of disciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives enables liberal arts graduates to become more nuanced and effective in any profession they ultimately pursue.” More →

Satyan Devadoss, Associate Professor of Mathematics: “A true liberal arts education equips us not only to understand mathematical form and structure but also to craft a thoughtful essay, to appreciate a performance or painting, to juggle molecules and matter and, dare I say, to compete on the athletic field.” More →

William R. Darrow, Cluett Professor of Religion: “Today the curriculum has been thoroughly internationalized, almost 50 percent of undergraduates study abroad, international presence in the faculty has grown, and this year the international student population is 144.” More →

Sarah R. Bolton, Dean of the College, Professor of Physics: “Williams holds a particular, privileged place in higher education. We must constantly improve equity of opportunity on three fronts—access, support for our students and engagement with the national context.” More →

A 3D Printer Debuts at Williams

“3D printing is going to be pervasive in the future, and I want to be able to say I was involved from the first,” says sophomore Christine M. Cunningham ’15, a likely computer science major. As one of the team of 10 students that worked with design engineer and model maker Michael Taylor and computer science professor Morgan McGuire to build a 3D printer during Winter Study, Cunningham has reason to be proud.

 

3D printer working

Christine Cunningham ’15, Morgan McGuire, Michael Taylor, and Sam Donow ’16. Photo by Daniel Seidita ’16.

3D printing, also known as desktop fabrication, is being used to produce components in a variety of industries from the medical industry to toy manufacturers. Somewhat like a dot-matrix printer, the head of this machine moves across a flat glass surface, spelling out its final product in blue plastic—not onto paper but through a thin tube of plastic attached to the top in a large spool. One of the students unwinds it little by little, allowing the machine to have a continuous supply. The hot head of the machine feeds the melted plastic into a shape determined by the electronic file the printer reads from a nearby laptop.

As the head moves back and forth along the square glass plate, the first layer of blue plastic is laid down in the shape of an airplane, line by line, slowly moving back and forth, up and down, and around the glass. The second layer’s applied as the head raises itself a fraction of a millimeter. And on it goes, moving vertically up with each layer, along what the students call the Z-axis, at a rate nearly imperceptible to the eye.

The students built this printer from directions they cobbled together through open-source materials. People all over the world who are building 3D printers contribute their stories, measurements, and instructions to various websites: think Wikipedia for DIY computer engineers. With no clear set of instructions or a ready-made kit, the students figured out what materials they would need, and how to put them together, through a lot of trial and error.

The team recognizes that their printer’s a work in progress, maintaining that the glass surface is not perfectly flat and that the temperature the heads heats the plastic is not as precise as they would like. But the printer impressively gets the job done. After about 15 minutes, there exists something that, moments before, was a spool of plastic tubing: a small blue airplane.

Their biggest goal, says team member Daniel Seidita ’16, is “to create the college’s first usable 3D printer, and to use that to create some of the parts necessary to build another 3D printer.” To that end, the team is proudly contributing their printer to the computer science workshop, so Williams students can continue to improve—and use—the printer into the future.

Nurturing the Creative Spark

SparkTruck

The goal of SparkTruck, an “educational build-mobile” created by Eugene Korsunskiy ’08 and classmates at Stanford Design School, was to ignite a life-long love of creating things, one group of fourth graders at a time. Photo by Larry Rippel.

Build a robot using a watch battery, a vibrating pager motor, some tape, and a Popsicle stick.

Those are the instructions Eugene Korsunskiy ’08 gave to groups of fourth graders as he and a team of fellow Stanford Design School students drove coast-to-coast last summer in a redesigned delivery van called SparkTruck. Stopping along the way at schools, science fairs, museums, and libraries, their goal was helping kids learn an essential step in the road to success—failure.

Korsunskiy and his team were charged for their master’s project to “Do anything you want. Make sure it has a positive impact on people. You have a year.” The students had been moved by Sir Ken Robinson’s famous TED talk calling for more creativity in education. “SparkTruck was a response to that call,” Korsunskiy says.

“Creativity happens when you stumble on something that doesn’t feel right, so you poke around and try to make it better,” he says. “That chair is ugly; I will paint it. That tool is clunky; I will design a new one.” Korsunskiy, who studied art at Williams before earning his master of fine arts in design from Stanford in 2012, wanted kids to know it’s OK to poke around.

“You’re much more likely to make something that succeeds if you’re okay with failing several times before you get there,” he says. “If we can instill in kids a resilient mindset—one that prepares them to learn from setbacks rather than be discouraged by them—they are much more likely to persist when tackling complicated problems.”

To fund the project, Korsunskiy and his team ran a campaign on Kickstarter—a fundraising platform in which donor pledges are not collected unless the dollar goal is met. They raised more than $30,000 from 426 backers. It was enough to purchase a used truck and much of the equipment they needed, including a laser cutter, a vinyl cutter, and hand tools. Additional donations came in the form of 3-D printers, and food and lodging expenses were covered by the organizations the team visited. “Sometimes people put us up in their houses,” Korsunskiy says.

In the workshops involving the robot, the children often approached Korsunskiy to ask for his help. He’d respond by asking “What do you think?” and, he says, “It was really cool to see their eyes light up and a gear shift take place in their head as they realized that they were expected to tinker their way to their own solution.”

Now that the SparkTruck team is back in Stanford, Korsunskiy is shifting gears, having accepted a teaching position in the Stanford Design Program. The truck itself may become an ongoing project run by design students.

Whether on the road or in the classroom, Korsunskiy offers this advice on how to keep the creative spark alive: “Stumbling is virtually guaranteed as long as you keep exploring new ideas. So try to fix something broken. You might not get it right the first time, but you’ll learn a lot along the way.”

For more about SparkTruck visit http://sparktruck.org

Winter Study: Reading for Life

“Books possess a magical, elusive quality that we often overlook when we read as scholars,” says Rudi Yniguez ’16. “In a typical class, our time is spent screening sentences for symbolism or analyzing syntax, instead of allowing the natural rhythm of the book to pull or push us along as it’s intended to do.”

After a snowy sleigh ride to a cabin in the woods, Cassandra Cleghorn and her students read War and Peace during Winter Study.

After a snowy sleigh ride to a cabin in the woods, Cassandra Cleghorn and her students read War and Peace during Winter Study.

So when the opportunity presented itself to read Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace—all 1,296 pages of it—during Winter Study in January, Yniguez jumped at the chance.

She and 14 other students are taking part in the class “War and Peace,” led by Cassandra Cleghorn, senior lecturer in English and American studies. The class meets for three hours each Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, with optional, all-day “drop in and read” sessions on Mondays.

Winter Study is “the perfect occasion to lose and then find oneself in the enormous world of a book many people consider the greatest novel of all time,” says Cleghorn, who, herself, had never read War and Peace. “I’m reading the novel not as an expert but as a liberal arts student, as a lover of literature.

“This class,” she adds, “is about learning how to read for life.”

Cleghorn had her students sign a contract agreeing to complete the novel by the end of Winter Study, all the while marking off their progress on posters hanging on their classroom wall. And they’re reading in all sorts of ways—individually and as a group, with guest lecturers providing context on Russian pronunciation and military strategy, and in different settings.

One recent afternoon, the class took a sleigh ride to a forest cabin, where they lit a fire and read aloud from the novel. “To feel the sensation of being pulled on a 19th century wooden sleigh through snowy fields and forests, and then to read aloud Tolstoy’s account of a horse-drawn sleigh ride, helps us become more active and imaginative readers,” Cleghorn says.

For theater and comparative literature major Sarah Sanders ’14, the class “has reminded me how much I love books. It had been a long time since I’d stayed still for more than two hours at a time, reading a novel.”

Says Yniguez, the only first-year student in a class of juniors and seniors who are majoring in Arabic studies, art history, math, political economy, and psychology (to name a few), “I had no choice but to allow each page to wash over me. War and Peace has reminded me of the immense power of literature to not only introduce me to a world that I would not otherwise have been able to experience, but also to provide an escape from the one in which I reside.”

Click here to see a full list of courses being offered during Winter Study.

Gangster Squad, Based on the Book By Paul Lieberman ’71, Now In Theaters

Movie poster of Gangster Squad, based on the book by Paul Lieberman, Williams Class of 1971

The movie Gangster Squad, based on a nonfiction book of the same name by Paul Lieberman ’71, is now playing in theaters across the country. The movie and book tell the story of a real-life, covert unit of the Los Angeles Police Department created after World War II to crack down on Mickey Cohen and other “undesirables” in L.A.

Gangster Squad traces its roots back to a seven-part series Lieberman, a longtime newspaperman, wrote for the L.A. Times in 2008. “On the job a decade before J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI acknowledged the existence of the Mafia,” Lieberman wrote of the gangster squad, “they took an anything-goes approach to making life hell for Mickey Cohen and driving other such characters from the Southern California sunshine.”

The movie features Sean Penn as Mickey Cohen and stars Josh Brolin, Ryan Gosling, Nick Nolte, and Emma Stone. Lieberman is an executive producer, and fellow Eph Peter Nelson ’76 served as his lawyer for the movie project. You can view the trailer here. (Gangster Squad is rated R by the Motion Picture Association of America for strong violence and language.)

Acting at Williams

Williams students study acting and learn how to present themselves in the world.

Arts Expo

10 am – 5 pm | Paresky

This day-long arts expo will feature performances by Williams students and will showcase art created during Winter Study. Desserts all day!

5 – 9 pm | Williams College Museum of Art
WCMA at Night, featuring a movement and sound installation by Hana van der Kolk’s Winter Study course “Working Together/ Declarations of Independence.” The museum is open late for music, food, dancing, and more!

9 pm | The Log
Cap off the night with a capella performances by your favorite Williams groups!

Chris Murphy ’96 Sworn in as U.S. Senator

Congratulations to Chris Murphy ’96, who on Jan. 3 took the oath of office to become Connecticut’s newest U.S. senator. Murphy, 39, is the youngest member of the Senate and replaces Joe Lieberman, who retired at the end of last year. Murphy joins fellow Eph and Democratic U.S. Sen. Mark Udall ’72 of Colorado, who also took the oath of office as a member of the 113th Congress.

Learn more about Murphy and Udall at their Senate web sites.