In contrast to the predictions of an emerging globalized, unified world, many observers of international politics have seen indications that the world may be dividing into competitive regional blocs. European unification, NAFTA, suggestions of a rising Asia, and projections of either a more peaceful New Middle East or an Islamist Middle East all point toward the growing centrality of regionalism. Analysts are divided on whether such regionalization is likely to make the world more or less stable, warlike, and prosperous. This course asks whether the perception of the increasing primacy of regional orders is accurate, and then explores the theoretical and policy implications of regionalization. Should the United States support or oppose regionalism? The course then compares different regions, to determine the extent to which cultural, institutional, economic and political differences among regions make for differences in the prospects for conflict or cooperation. Among the regions to be compared include the Middle East, Europe, the post-Soviet zones, and Asia. Requirements: research paper and several short papers. Prerequisite: Political Science 202. International Relations Subfield