In this course, we will study the contemporary literature in analytic philosophy on the nature of knowledge and rational belief. Epistemologists seek answers to the following kinds of questions: -When is it rational to have a particular belief? -What is knowledge (as opposed to opinion)? -In order to be justified in holding a belief, must someone know (or believe) that she is justified in holding that belief? -What, if anything, justifies our scientific knowledge? These questions are typically asked within a framework where the overarching goal is attaining truth and avoiding falsity. Beyond this common ground, however, epistemologists are much divided. Some maintain that epistemological issues are solely the province of philosophy. Others maintain that these questions will only yield to methods that incorporate our broader insight into the world including, perhaps, feminist thought or science. Further, even where there is agreement as to the proper way of answering epistemological questions, there is a stunning variety of possible answers to each question. Our goal will be a rigorous appraisal of the contemporary epistemological literature. Requirements: weekly short writing assignments (3-4 pages) and one longer final paper (12-15 pages). Prerequisite: Philosophy 102 required; Philosophy 202, 204, 206 or another course in analytic philosophy highly recommended.